Abstract
Ola Electric created a buzz in the Indian electric vehicle (EV) market with its innovative approach and record-breaking sales. Within just two years, the company managed to become a household name, riding on its promise of futuristic electric scooters. However, the meteoric rise was followed by a sharp decline, with complaints, controversies, and market share erosion dominating its narrative. This blog dives into the eight major reasons behind the downfall of Ola Electric and the lessons it offers for businesses in the EV industry.
Introduction
The electric vehicle industry in India has been growing at an unprecedented pace, driven by the need for sustainable mobility solutions and government incentives. Among the frontrunners, Ola Electric quickly made a name for itself by leveraging its existing ride-hailing platform and launching the S1 and S1 Pro electric scooters. With over 500,000 bookings in a short span, the future seemed bright for the company.
However, the initial success was short-lived as Ola Electric began facing significant challenges. Complaints from customers, a lack of service infrastructure, and product reliability issues have raised questions about the company’s long-term viability. Here are the eight critical reasons behind Ola Electric’s struggles:
1. Launching a Product Without Adequate Preparation
Ola’s scooters, S1 and S1 Pro, were originally designed for European markets by the Dutch company Etergo, which Ola acquired. These scooters were launched in India with minimal changes, without rigorous testing for Indian roads and climate conditions. This lack of research and development (R&D) led to long-term performance issues.
The initial hype around the scooters’ futuristic features, including app connectivity and touchscreen displays, attracted a massive customer base. However, Ola’s inability to deliver on its promises including delays in delivery and hardware upgrades led to frustration among consumers. The decision to use the same hardware for both models and later they offered free upgrades from S1 to S1 Pro further highlighted a lack of strategic planning.
2. Insufficient Service Infrastructure
Despite rapid sales, Ola Electric failed to establish an adequate network of service centers. While the company claims to have 500 service centers, customer experiences tell a different story. The lack of trained staff and infrastructure has left customers waiting for months for repairs, leading to widespread dissatisfaction.
For middle-class customers, Ola’s primary target audience, these unresolved complaints are a significant financial and emotional burden. The dissatisfaction has led to negative reviews, online trolling, and even extreme incidents like customers setting up Ola showrooms on fire.
3. Flawed Business Model
Unlike traditional automotive companies like Hero, TVS, and Bajaj, which rely on dealers for sales and services, Ola Electric adopted a direct-to-consumer (D2C) model. While this approach gave them complete control over the customer experience, it also burdened the company with responsibilities that could have been better managed by third-party dealers.
This over-reliance on an untested business model has contributed to inefficiencies in manufacturing, sales, and after-sales service.
4. Over-Reliance on Technology
In an attempt to stand out, Ola eliminated traditional keys and made scooters entirely dependent on touchscreen controls and mobile apps. While innovative, this decision backfired when technical glitches rendered scooters immobile. Although the company later introduced physical keys, these were only available in the cheapest models, leaving premium customers helpless during system failures.
5. Arrogance in Addressing Customer Complaints
When complaints about scooters catching fire and other safety concerns arose, Ola’s CEO, Bhavish Aggarwal, dismissed them casually, comparing them to incidents of petrol scooters catching fire. This indifference alienated customers, who expected accountability and proactive solutions.
An incident involving comedian Kunal Kamra’s tweet about Ola’s poor service elicited an arrogant response from Aggarwal, causing further damage to the company’s reputation. The next day, Ola’s market share dropped by 9%, resulting in a loss of ₹3,400 crore.
6. Limited Product Range
With only two products, the S1 and S1 Pro, Ola Electric has put all its eggs in one basket. This over-dependence has left the company vulnerable, as any loss of trust in these models directly affects its market share. Unlike competitors offering diverse product lines, Ola’s narrow focus limits its ability to cater to varied customer needs.
7. High Employee Attrition Rates
Ola Electric’s work culture has been a significant challenge, with an attrition rate of 48% and an average employee tenure of just 11 months. Unrealistic targets and intense work environments have driven away talent, affecting the company’s operational efficiency. In comparison, competitors like Ather Energy and Hero Electric have attrition rates of 18% and 4%, respectively, indicating a more stable workforce.
Know about business strategies through this video-
8. Growing Competition and Regulatory Scrutiny
Ola Electric initially enjoyed a first-mover advantage, as established players like Bajaj and TVS were late to enter the EV market. However, as these brands launched reliable and well-tested electric scooters, Ola’s market share dropped from 52% to 27% within six months.
Additionally, Ola is under investigation by three government agencies:
- Central Consumer Protection Authority (CCPA): Over 10,000 complaints have been filed against Ola’s scooters.
- Ministry of Road Transport and Highways (MoRTH): Launched an investigation into the increasing complaints.
- Ministry of Heavy Industries (MHI): Questioned ARAI’s certification of Ola’s scooters despite known issues.
Don’t miss out this interesting podcast which will reveal many business secrets-
Conclusion
Ola Electric’s decline is a cautionary tale for businesses aiming to disrupt the market with innovation. While the company showed promise by introducing cutting-edge technology and capturing the market’s imagination, its lack of preparation, service infrastructure, and customer-centric approach has overshadowed its initial success.
To regain its footing, Ola Electric must prioritize product quality, expand its service network, and rebuild customer trust. Learning from established automotive brands and addressing employee concerns could also help the company recover. In a competitive and rapidly evolving EV market, the ability to adapt and evolve is crucial for long-term survival.
The story of Ola Electric serves as a reminder that success in the EV industry requires not just innovation but also meticulous planning, robust infrastructure, and a relentless focus on customer satisfaction.
